Help - Search - Member List - Calendar
Full Version: We know For A Fact
Stool Pigeons Wire Message Board > Stool World > Political Stool
NV 375
Thank god it wasn't some Joe Schmoe making such claims. THe media would've had a feeding frenzy and suddenly become very scrutinizing of Joe and he would be incarcerated in a fine federal facility.

• "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction." -- Vice President Dick Cheney, Aug. 26, 2002.

• "Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons." -- President Bush, Sept. 12, 2002.

• "The Iraqi regime possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons." -- Bush, Oct. 7, 2002.

• "We've also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that would be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We're concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using the UAVs for missions targeting the United States." -- Bush, Oct. 7, 2002.

• "The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls his 'nuclear mujahideen' -- his nuclear holy warriors. Satellite photographs reveal that Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program in the past."-- Bush, Oct. 7, 2002.

• "We know for a fact there are weapons there." -- White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, Jan. 9, 2003.

• "Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of Sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent." -- Bush, Jan. 28, 2003.

• "We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more." -- Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5, 2003.

• "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised." -- Bush, March 17, 2003.

• "Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly." -- Fleischer, March 21, 2003.

• "I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction." -- Kenneth Adelman, Defense Policy Board, March 23, 2003.

• "We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad." -- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003.

• "We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so." -- Bush, May 3, 2003.

• "I never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country." -- Rumsfeld, May 4, 2003.

• "U.S. officials never expected that we were going to open garages and find weapons of mass destruction." -- National security adviser Condoleezza Rice, May 12, 2003.

• "They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer." -- Rumsfeld, May 27, 2003.

• "We based our decisions on good, sound intelligence, and the -- our people are going to find out the truth. And the truth will say that this intelligence was good intelligence. There's no doubt in my mind." -- Bush, July 17, 2003.

To quote Bill O'Reilly of Fox News: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clear he had nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again." -- March 18, 2003.


Qoutes, Courtesy of Molly Ivins
constantpated
QUOTE (NV 375 @ Sep 5 2003, 02:58 AM)
To quote Bill O'Reilly of Fox News: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clear he had nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again." -- March 18, 2003. -- Qoutes, Courtesy of Molly Ivins

Thanks for the apology, Bill.

QUOTE
10 Feb 2004 Still lacking any substantive explanations from the White House, Bill O'Reilly grudgingly apologizes on Good Morning America.
O'REILLY: Well, my analysis was wrong and I'm sorry. Absolutely, you know.
GIBSON: Camera's right there.
O'REILLY: Um, and I'm not pleased about it.
GIBSON: Camera's right there.
O'REILLY: Yeah, I just said it. What do you want me to do? Go over and kiss the camera?


But why does he not remember what he said to his producer over dinner?

Or should we just not trust Bill O'Reilly?
megabear
Quite a list.... Still the majority of the American populace seems totally oblivious to this. They're cerebral disc drives are overloaded and they can't seem to pull off a de-frag so there is room to squeeze in the belatedly recognized truth.
yellowfish
I think the bulk of the US population knows bushco lied and lied and lied, but they still will vote for him. Two people I work with acknowledge that Bush lied but they are still not voting for Kerry. Here are the reasons why:

1 - Stance on Aborotion
2- Kerry is a "Liberal"

They have been so brain washed by the matrix (O'Rielly's, Limbaughs, Fox news, etc.) that anyone with the taint liberalism must be hated and avioded like the plague. The "us Vs. them" mentality has paralyzed the minds so many sheeple. The truth does not matter as much as hating liberals for being liberal. They love the lying liars! Bush could grow horns and spit fire and they would still vote for him, just as long as he isnt a liberal.

ShitEatingGrinner
Americans have the government they deserve, and will continue to have the same. F'em. Most of them will NEVER figure it out. They'll be told who to hate and kill and they will march off or send their kids off to die. F'em. When the system collapses and a huge number of the population is starving and homelss, they still will not have figured out who "did it to them." F'em, they did it to themselves.
threadbare
Facts don't matter. This election is about religion. A belief in Jesus, the rights of the unborn and the no rights of everyone else, cept Christians.
constantpated
Stoolies,

QUOTE
Thanks to all who challenged me and made this possible: user posted image


Constant got quoted: First, one blog; then the home page of a regional; then it hit the networks; then worldwide. ohmy.gif

Here's how to find it on Google

Type in "O'Reilly" into Google news, and you'll see. Look for the article titled, "Olbermann blog debuts with O'Reilly harassment suit" -- you have to sign in at the link--But here's the open-access version.

Where it started

After hitting the blog, it hit the appeared on the homepage of the Providence, RI Journal, [ProJo], through their blog-writer -- The blog just below this time: [October 14, 2004, 6:53 p.m] is where its at.

Network distribution stateside

You can see on the referral box [lower right-box of the blog], where hits coming in from -- Seattle, Dallas, Chicago, and others.
  • KVUE, TX [Dalllas]
  • KING5.com, WA [Seattle]
  • WHAS 11.com, KY [Louisville]
  • Press-Enterprise, CA

    :More17 Oct 2004 blink.gif
  • WVEC.com VA [Hampton Roads]
  • projo.com RI [Providence]
  • DentonRC.com TX [Denton]
  • KHOU.com, TX [Houston]
  • DallasNews.com TX [Dallas]
  • azfamily.com AZ [Phoenix]
  • KREM.com WA [Spokane]
  • KMOV.com MO [St Louis]

    21 Oct 2004
  • txcn.com TX
  • wfaa.com TX [DFW]
  • kgw.com OR, SW WA
  • wwltv.com LA [New Orleans]
  • wcnc.com [NC] Charlotte
Constant: one heart-beat away from the Spin Zone.
cool.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.