Pee Brain
Mar 10 2004, 03:43 PM
i told you liberal nutjobs that this state was nuts. we are paying $24,000 per family per year to support their miserable, unskilled asses. now, the wages will be raised, but just watch as the welfare expands.
SEE YA CALIFORNIA!
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2004/03/10..._0419_48_24.txt
threadbare
Mar 10 2004, 07:08 PM
Pee, I hear the govt is thinking of forming a national guard for class warfare. Seeing as you've already seen action in the trenches of low cost housing, I nominate you for a commission in the officer corp. What's great about the national guard is you don't have to be a full time bigot, you can be nasty every other weekend and only so many weeks out of the year!!!
I'm sorry, Pee. Couldn't resist--liberal nutjob, you understand!
Pee Brain
Mar 11 2004, 01:16 AM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 10 2004, 02:08 PM) |
Pee, I hear the govt is thinking of forming a national guard for class warfare. Seeing as you've already seen action in the trenches of low cost housing, I nominate you for a commission in the officer corp. What's great about the national guard is you don't have to be a full time bigot, you can be nasty every other weekend and only so many weeks out of the year!!!
I'm sorry, Pee. Couldn't resist--liberal nutjob, you understand! |
what i didnt include the the proposal for a 1/2 vote per 16 year old and a 1/4 for 14 yo's in state election. thats means the faster a voting block (ethnic and racial groups????) reproduce, the more votes they get - and quicker too. look and see who has highest birth rate, then see who benfits the most - that not racial in anyway, right?
the battlelines have been drawn for a long time. if they only picked my pocket every weekend, then i would join the guard, but since i see the battle as hopeless, im am choosing Proactive Objector status (PO'ed for short) and moving. im PO'ed all the time now, so there,

and ill soon pack up my meager belongs and move outta this crazy asylum.
you sit down and get your abacus out and start calculating $24,000 per low income couple and you will see alot of tax dollars. also note, that the taxpayer is presented as the victim, with the inference being that the employer is the villian. the fact that the worker has little or no skills is not even addressed. the fact that the primary driver of population growth is immigration, not births in exceee of deaths. and the bulk of immigration is hispanic, much of it illegal - until they have their first child of course. this is fact, not bigotted, not racist. im hate supporting any able-bodied moron of any race creed, color, etc, that has no skills, earns minimum wage (which is artificially high to start -and costs me money at the register already) and has 6 children, which taxpayers are expected to support. SCREW THAT!
why not just make minmum wage $100,000? its the same basis as $12/hr, and that way everyone could fly home first class to mexico to visit?
its easy to call someone a bigot, and i know you put a grin after it, so there's no harm done right? but people better wake-up and stop tiptoeing around the heart of the issues or its gonna be too late.
BTW, did you know that im african-american?
threadbare - just so you know, there is no offense taken
Hi Ho
Mar 11 2004, 01:34 AM
Holy crap, I had no idea that things were so bad out there. I thought New Englanders were crazy. No wonder businesses are moving out and they can't build houses in AZ fast enough.
poor Arnold he'll get the blame when the state implodes.
Pee Brain
Mar 11 2004, 03:53 AM
| QUOTE (Hi Ho @ Mar 10 2004, 08:34 PM) |
Holy crap, I had no idea that things were so bad out there. I thought New Englanders were crazy. No wonder businesses are moving out and they can't build houses in AZ fast enough. poor Arnold he'll get the blame when the state implodes. |
yeah see Hi Ho,
its incremental here.... after all the taxes they have, they want to get another $.10/gallon at the pumps for the highway fund. they same highway fund they raided for all manner of socialist welfare b.s. - BTW, the fun was bloated by the tax increase on gasoline they jammed us with when the price of oil was low. at $2.35/gallon or more, you are already talking some serious coin for commuters.
the weather here has been great the past few days, but the costof living here is too great for me, im here for my children, unless i go crazier. the only way to change things is to starve the bastards of tax $$$$ and then let the great unwashed pay for their own children, food, housing, etc...
BTW, that $24,000/year is low... ive seen section-8 projects where section-8 is paying over $13,000yr for rent - so you so through and add the WIC, food, free transport, medical, free school lunches of breakfast & lunch, as well as after-school care. we're paying for all this, and didnt even get a romp in the sack for crying out loud.
BTW, i get faxes every morning at 3 am - i hear them from the office:
BAD CREDIT - NO JOB - NO MONEY - BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, NEED A LOAN?
NO PROBLEMS - RATES START AS LOW AS 1.25%
Hi Ho
Mar 11 2004, 04:54 AM
Maybe John Gault had the right idea.
America's abundance was not created by public sacrifices to the common good, but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes.
- Ayn Rand
The socialist idiots don't realize their grip on the golden goose's neck is choking off the air supply.
ShitEatingGrinner
Mar 11 2004, 05:11 AM
it's all a part of the grand inflationary effort. buy gold, silver, and platinum and celebrate the vaporization of your debt(if you have any). It's the seventies. Got bell bottoms? A golden coke spoon to wear around your neck?
"Keep it comin' love, keep it comin' love...don't stop it now don't stop it no..."
Pee Brain
Mar 13 2004, 06:06 AM
| QUOTE (ShitEatingGrinner @ Mar 11 2004, 12:11 AM) |
it's all a part of the grand inflationary effort. buy gold, silver, and platinum and celebrate the vaporization of your debt(if you have any). It's the seventies. Got bell bottoms? A golden coke spoon to wear around your neck?
"Keep it comin' love, keep it comin' love...don't stop it now don't stop it no..." |
yes, and its good for tax revenues too. ever wonder why they never index cap gains against inflation?
threadbare
Mar 14 2004, 04:37 PM
Peebrain, Arguments about who gets or keeps what are going to be raging for years. They're even causing rifts to form in the Sierra Club. I'm a little foggy on the details but I'll try to find it for this thread. California is a good case study, in my opinion, of the road to hell being paved with both good and bad intentions. The well intentioned believe the country can go on absorbing immigrants as it did decades ago. They're ideological stance is being nice all the time, no matter what. The businessmen understand the negative economic implications and are there to make a buck off immigration. I agree with you, that anyone who appeals to the govt. to request that people remain in their countries of origin and work their problems with over population out over there, aren't racist, they're pragmatic. In some case you could say they're also environmentally sensitive.
I don't necessarily think you're a racist bigot redneck, short fingered vulgarian, rube, politically retarded, moronic jackass.

Not for a minute. I DO regard the present political climate in California, from what you relate, to be the perfect breeding ground for racism with a capitol R. Native citizens who feel they're being short changed, over taxed in an economically constrained environment, aren't going to bother with the subtle details of the problem. They'll just start loathing anything that looks foreign or poor.
More education isn't always the answer. The more education people acquire, the more they drive wages down in their sector. Labour is a commodity, like anything else.
Immigration to the U.S.should be stopped in it's tracks. NOW. There is an oversupply of every concievable kind of labour and resentment is building. Environmentally and economically the law of diminishing returns is kicking in.Governments appear not to get it but they do get it and very well. They just don't want to alienate any particular voter base. And they know the people who are the most opposed to immigration, often don't vote. This will change.
Did you see the movie, "Gangs of New York"? This was the sub-text of the movie. The politicians encouraged immigration not because it was a good idea, at that time, but simply to garner more votes. I don't know the exact nature of immigration to New York in the 1900's but wouldn't be surprised if it was propelled by commerical interests with little sensitivity to the economic consequences for the people occupying the lower rungs of the social ladder. There were repeated blood baths and it wasn't always due to inherant racism, I'm sure.
The enemy is usually ensconsed in a wood panelled suite, resting comfortably, while his/her policies wreck havoc in the lives of the average person, and those clinging to the margins, trying to hold on.
I hear you PeeBrain, you just have to understand the poor and unskilled aren't the biggest part of the problem. The American born unemployed, unskilled are the result of the problem. Arnold What's his name isn't going to do anything about it, he's part of the over arching problem.
There has to be a huge international effort to dialogue about over population. It's going to destroy the planet, cause unresolvable conflict and scapegoating within society. This is what heads of governments should be working on right now. It should be priority one. Too bad they all believe in cancer, the philosophy of endless growth.
Pee Brain
Mar 22 2004, 05:27 PM
the east is red
Mar 23 2004, 06:07 AM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 14 2004, 11:37 AM) |
| There has to be a huge international effort to dialogue about over population. It's going to destroy the planet, cause unresolvable conflict and scapegoating within society. This is what heads of governments should be working on right now. It should be priority one. Too bad they all believe in cancer, the philosophy of endless growth. |
"It's not the End of the World, just the End of You."
The growth of the world's population is no longer accelerating.
Paul Erlich's perfect record of being dead wrong in his predictions for our planet are in no danger.
In most industrialized countries, the EU, Japan, Canada, Singapore, (I don't know about the US), the biggest population problem is that the birthrate is too low. As the postware "baby boom" sinks into senesence there's not enough new workers to pay for their upkeep. In the case of Canada the solution has been immigration. In the EU, immigration is in danger due to similar reasons as in California. In Japan, the plan is to avoid foreigners by developing robot.
Btw, rapidly developing China has a similar demographic problem.
India now feeds itself and is a net exporter of food as is the case in most ASEAN countries.
the east is red
Mar 23 2004, 06:20 AM
Albinos of the World Unite! You have nothing to lose but your brains!I'd include honarary dead white males such as Booker T. Washington, Honda, Morita (Sony), Lee and Yang, Yukawa, Tomonaga, and Madame Wu but otherwise the point is taken.
threadbare
Mar 24 2004, 03:55 PM
East is Red,
Canada can easily absorb more people, but not the numbers it would take to offset a global population growth spurt. The developed European nations can't. I don't care what twisted ideation some neo-con think tank wanker comes up with.
I didn't read your link, but will later. The argument that the developed nations are underpopulated, so immigration isn't a problem is use of selective logic.To use India as a case point to illustrate how many people you can successfully shoehorn into any given space is also a selective representation of reality. The conceptually challenged author of the articles should consider spending some "quality time" in the trash heaps of India scavenging with Mother Theresa's crew, for a REAL taste of overpopulation. OR... he can continue insinuating his distorted, commercially driven ideas into mainstream society and with any luck, wait for the same scenario to unfold in the U.S.
threadbare
Mar 24 2004, 04:34 PM
24 March 2004 – Up to a third of the world's people do not meet their physical and intellectual potential because of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, and without urgent action to fortify and supplement foods children in developing nations will remain at risk of underachieving, according to a new United Nations report released today.
"The overwhelming scope of the problem makes it clear that we must reach out to whole populations and protect them from the devastating consequences of vitamin and mineral deficiency," UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Executive Director Carol Bellamy said of the report jointly published by her agency and The Micronutrient Initiative, a not-for-profit organization based in Ottawa, Canada.
Unless action against vitamin and mineral deficiencies moves to a new level, the UN will not achieve its Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) of eradicating extreme poverty, improving maternal health and reducing child mortality by two-thirds by 2015, the report concludes.
The severe effects of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, such as anaemia, cretinism and blindness, have long been known, but the report sheds new light on other problems caused by less extreme deficiencies, such as a lack of iron which impairs intellectual development in young children and lowers national IQs.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?News...tion&Cr1=UNICEF
the east is red
Mar 24 2004, 10:15 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 24 2004, 11:34 AM) |
24 March 2004 – Up to a third of the world's people do not meet their physical and intellectual potential because of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, and without urgent action to fortify and supplement foods children in developing nations will remain at risk of underachieving, according to a new United Nations report released today.
"The overwhelming scope of the problem makes it clear that we must reach out to whole populations and protect them from the devastating consequences of vitamin and mineral deficiency," UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Executive Director Carol Bellamy said of the report jointly published by her agency and The Micronutrient Initiative, a not-for-profit organization based in Ottawa, Canada.
Unless action against vitamin and mineral deficiencies moves to a new level, the UN will not achieve its Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) of eradicating extreme poverty, improving maternal health and reducing child mortality by two-thirds by 2015, the report concludes.
The severe effects of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, such as anaemia, cretinism and blindness, have long been known, but the report sheds new light on other problems caused by less extreme deficiencies, such as a lack of iron which impairs intellectual development in young children and lowers national IQs.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?News...tion&Cr1=UNICEF |
Incidents of famine and malnutrition from the 20th century onwards are the result of politics, most often of the leftist pro-statist kind, not a lack of food.
Recent example, Zimbabwe.
the east is red
Mar 24 2004, 10:26 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 24 2004, 10:55 AM) |
East is Red,
Canada can easily absorb more people, but not the numbers it would take to offset a global population growth spurt. The developed European nations can't. I don't care what twisted ideation some neo-con think tank wanker comes up with.
I didn't read your link, but will later. The argument that the developed nations are underpopulated, so immigration isn't a problem is use of selective logic.To use India as a case point to illustrate how many people you can successfully shoehorn into any given space is also a selective representation of reality. The conceptually challenged author of the articles should consider spending some "quality time" in the trash heaps of India scavenging with Mother Theresa's crew, for a REAL taste of overpopulation. OR... he can continue insinuating his distorted, commercially driven ideas into mainstream society and with any luck, wait for the same scenario to unfold in the U.S. |
I would guess offhand that the density of people in Osaka, Japan is as high as or higher than that of the parts of India you have in mind.
Similarly, the population density of Freemont, California is higher than that of the perpetual disaster area known as Bangladesh. [ The population density of Hong Kong is higher than either of these. ]
Yet the quality of life is very much higher in both of the former as compared to the later.
This is a result of the different choices these societies have made.
Ie., "all cultures are not created equal".
Anyways, back to your initial motivation - the global growth in populations is no longer accelerating, and in fact, may be decelerating.
Paul Ehrlich and his type of Doomsday promotoers are simply modern-day flaggelants.
"It's not the End of the World, it's just the End of You."
threadbare
Mar 24 2004, 11:53 PM
East is red,
Technology and self imposed conformity to certain personal, social and political ideals have ameliorated some of the consequences of overpopulation in nations like Japan.
The source of many of their present day problems, isn't a dearth of new recruits into their tax generating, economic machinery. The essential problem is their baby boom, the one that occurred in the first few decades of the 20th century. That boom fuelled a desire for expansion, thusly WW11, and is now manifesting as the demographic and economic problem of a burgeoning population of the elderly, without a corresponding high birth rate.
At some point progressive societies who have learned through the pain of the consequences of overpopulation, to curb their numbers, will find they run into the same problem. Who is going to take care of the elderly and fill tax coffers when the population declines? You may advocate for a solution that will feed a reproductive ponzy, but others would choose something sustainable.
The present decline in successful places like Hong Kong, represent in part, the law of diminishing returns implicit in a system that has breached homeostasis. It is a perfect example of a population that could recede back into bleak poverty partly because they've overshot the mark, population wise.
Having more children to cure the world's woes, is like deficit spending. It's deficit breeding. Eventually someone has to pay.
ShitEatingGrinner
Mar 25 2004, 03:29 AM
This Fred guy is a riot. His "critique" of evolutionary theory...a wonder. Knuckleheaded arguments for sure. I'd suggest he study some laboratory fruit fly experiments in which the flies evolve to live in a DDT bath. Or better yet, maybe Fred should take a DDT bath as punishment for idiocy. The gene pool might benefit, although he's probably already passed on his defective chromosomes

.
http://www.fredoneverything.net/FOE_Frame_Column.htm
the east is red
Mar 25 2004, 02:45 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 24 2004, 06:53 PM) |
East is red,
Technology and self imposed conformity to certain personal, social and political ideals have ameliorated some of the consequences of overpopulation in nations like Japan.
The source of many of their present day problems, isn't a dearth of new recruits into their tax generating, economic machinery. The essential problem is their baby boom, the one that occurred in the first few decades of the 20th century. That boom fuelled a desire for expansion, thusly WW11, and is now manifesting as the demographic and economic problem of a burgeoning population of the elderly, without a corresponding high birth rate. At some point progressive societies who have learned through the pain of the consequences of overpopulation, to curb their numbers, will find they run into the same problem. Who is going to take care of the elderly and fill tax coffers when the population declines? You may advocate for a solution that will feed a reproductive ponzy, but others would choose something sustainable.
The present decline in successful places like Hong Kong, represent in part, the law of diminishing returns implicit in a system that has breached homeostasis. It is a perfect example of a population that could recede back into bleak poverty partly because they've overshot the mark, population wise.
Having more children to cure the world's woes, is like deficit spending. It's deficit breeding. Eventually someone has to pay. |
The "overpopulated" Japanese have the highest life-expectancy in the world.
Significantly higher than Canada, the US, or Sarawak with their wide open spaces.
So we should look forward to "overpopulation".
As for self-imposed conformity, in my experience there's nothing more conformist like the suburbia of Canada and the United States. Painfully bland.
Coming back to your main assumption, that the world is suffering from "overpopulation".
Where is this overpopulation? Not in Canada, not in the US, not in Europe (including Eastern Europe), not in Russia, not in Australia, not in Malaysia. Added up, that the majority of the the earth's surface. In India? India is a net exporter of food.
It's standard of living is starting to rise rapidly now that it's dismantaling it's corrupt statist and bureacratic system.
Have a look a the composite map of the world at night. Most places on our planet are thinly inhabited.
High birth rates are, in reality, asssociated with countries with high rates of mortality, esp., infant mortality. You hope to have some of your children survive to look after you in your dotage.
The proponents of the overpopulation myth are people such as Paul Erlich and the "Club of Rome". According to these modern-day flaggelants by the 80's there should have been worldwide shortages of
food - more food than ever,
water - last time I was in the area the Great Lakes were still great,
oil - the Alberta oil sands in your own backyard,
rampant epidemics - AIDS in sub-saharan Africa, but that's due to lifestyle choices,
the life expectancy should have plummeted - rising worldwide, again with the exception of sub-Saharan Africa
choking on pollution - well, if you've gone through a forest-burning smog in Sarawak, you'd probably tend to agree, but otherwise the air is cleaner than ever.
deforestation - the density of forest has actually increased in the "overpopulated" northeastern part of the US
and, last but not least,
overpopulation - one of the biggest problems in the industrialized world today is the low birthrate and declining populations.
You'd think that being so consistently wrong for so long would discourage these people, but like all fanatics, they keep looking forward to the future where we are all "punished" for our "sins".
Unabonkers
Mar 25 2004, 06:45 PM
Just because pundits are no longer singing McCartney’s "Too Many People" in unison doesn’t mean there is no longer a problem with overpopulation. Malthus hasn’t left the building.
Some years back I taught an astronomy class, and when someone brought up the idea of terraforming Mars and otherwise zooming off to other worlds as a way of dealing with overpopulation, I responded with a straightforward mathematical argument: if you extrapolated from present population growth (I concede this was ten years ago, citing an argument ten years old at the time) there would be a shell of solid people expanding away from earth faster than the speed of light within a few hundred years. The guy in class refused to buy the logical results of exponential growth rates, and their obvious impossibility in the material world. A member of the planetary society, with a Contact high from reading Carl Sagan, he knew otherwise. Space was the answer. But space ain’t the answer, up there, or down here.
I remember watching some designated expert on CNN claim the planet can support up to 40 billion people -- thats right, 40 billion -- as long as developing countries get their act together and accept western agribiz know-how. Right. Like we've already done so much for the Third world countries in that department, convincing their leaders to follow export-driven economic models and indentured servitude through the IMF. In many countries, the reserve food supply is down to just a few days or weeks. Water reserves, already shrinking from a combination of climate change and human demand, are increasingly routed away from arable land and into overpopulated cities. Yet pontiff and pundit alike say be fruitful and multiply.
A lengthy piece The New York Times a few years back asserted that overpopulation is not the problem once thought, and that the rate of increase is levelling off. This is only half of the picture, according to the Worldwatch Institute's Lester Brown. In some countries, he claims, a slowing of the growth is taking place only partly because of success in bringing birth rates down – but its also occurring because of newly emergent conditions like AIDS that are raising death rates. Some argue we’re already hitting the limits of the biosphere, and the threat of mutant strains of old familiar illnesses, and Andromeda Strain varieties from tropical zones, are signs of this. In any case, we would expect population increase to start to level out once earth nears its carrying capacity, with a crash likely to follow.
Arguing about which part of the world can sustain an influx of people from other parts d is like arguing over seating arrangements as the car heads for the edge of the cliff.
threadbare
Mar 27 2004, 04:32 PM
Commodity prices, particularly wheat, increased oil prices reflect, in part, the environmental damage we have leashed on the world in the past century. Finally, the damage is beginning to show up on the books. Thomas Malthus is not dead. He was only stifled by the success of decades of over consumption of oil. The law of diminishing returns and depleted resources is kicking in. We're now engaged in bidding wars for essential items. Beautiful!
the east is red
Mar 28 2004, 04:30 PM
Part A: Commodity prices, particularly wheat, increased oil prices
Part B: reflect, in part, the environmental damage we have leashed on the world in the past century.
Part A does not follow from part B.
To continue.
What enviromental damage are you referring to in particular. While it's true that local regions, esp. in the former statist parts of the world such as the FSU, have experienced great damage, what evidence is there that this has had any global effect?
Oil will run out eventually. On the other hand, the current increase in all commodity prices reflects two things: 1) physical - demand from China and other rapidly developing part of the world and 2) monetary - inflation due to to many dollars being printed.
The problem of oil will be addressed. But it will be, as is always the case, by scientists and engineers who role up their sleeves and solve problems, not by those simply repeating unsubstantiated platitudes.
Pee Brain
Mar 28 2004, 07:36 PM
hey! who turned this into a UNICEF world population thread?

if thats your worry, get snipped and send money to some third world buggar who keeps pumping out ninos; or better yet, join the frigging peace corp. i only care about the overpopulation of my pueblo by criminals (read: illegal aliens) and the pandering to somehow grab their "votes". there is plenty of food and water, just too many illegal aliens trying to steal it and too many liberal jackoffs redistributing wealth. i almost broke my ankle in a friggin pothole the other day and then i had to sit for hours in an emergency room with the great unwashed. almost like when your car breaks down in southcentral l.a.; its like "i definitely dont belong here"; problem is, this is my home

. what the hell happended? most appeared to be there for colds, influenza and chronic drug/alchohol abuse and related maladies... its hard to avoid them with the waiting room so crowded, and worse i was in a wheel chair so i had to keep moving when they sat next to me and started with the tuberculous hacking.
the malthusian timebomb discussion should be on another thread.
threadbare
Mar 29 2004, 12:31 AM
East is Red,
Countries that are now diverting water away from agriculture to growing cities, are having to import wheat. This likely impacts cost. In North America, global warming is responsible for odd weather that has caused droughts that negatively impact food production, particularly wheat. I notice bread is more expensive than it was a couple of years ago.
Global warming is related to over use of oil. It's rocketing cost now is at least partly due to diminishing reserves.
You don't undermine my point, but rather reinforce it, by implying that the cost of commodities is not necessarily related to population but rather increased competition for those commodities, coming from places like China. Bingo! I agree that a certain amount of the cost increase in the U.S. is due to weakening dollar too.
Scientists and engineers have their place and have done a marvelous job at providing a convincing barrier of wellbeing between the average person and the natural world. Engineers and scientists will continue doing what they know how to do: construct technical fixes to problems caused by solutions they provided already. Where you see this approach as the logical answer, I see a Rube Goldberg machine based on a Rube Goldberg approach, descending straight from here to Hell.
It's much simpler to just curb our numbers.
Pee Brain--Illegal aliens are far from being "criminals". You have to establish criminal intent, before labelling someone a criminal, and having a desire to escape a used up moonscape of a country for one that looks like it may hold more promise, hardly qualifies someone as a criminal. Your thoughts on immigration lead directly to discussions about competition for resources both at home and abroad. Your trip down the rabbit hole, and subsequent visit to the emergency ward is a good cinematic representation of a larger problem. It's all about the Malthusian bomb. That is what East is Red and I are discussing.
Question: Have you been deloused? Did you feel safe having this procedure?
the east is red
Mar 29 2004, 03:03 AM
| QUOTE (Pee Brain @ Mar 28 2004, 02:36 PM) |
hey! who turned this into a UNICEF world population thread? if thats your worry, get snipped and send money to some third world buggar who keeps pumping out ninos; or better yet, join the frigging peace corp.
the malthusian timebomb discussion should be on another thread.
|
It interesting how the concerned altruists expect the developing world to make all the sacrifices for their views.
Point well taken. Will move the discussion to a new thread.
threadbare
Mar 29 2004, 05:20 PM
East is Red, Noone expects the developing world to "make all the sacrifices", and pragmatism of approach is as important as altruism, in this case. I am simply advocating the simplest approach to exploding populations and the attendant miseries for all. They can't breed their way out of the problem anymore than we can, and seeing as we are the most voracious consumers of resources, we should focus on voluntary simplicity rather than have involuntary simplicity forced upon us.
The answer for the U.S isn't to become the sponge that mops up excess humanity. That's not good for the globe, and not good for the citizens in the U.S. It's becoming clear in places like California that assimilation isn't happening, isn't encouraged, and the economic cost of absorbing immigrants is too high, directly through taxation, and indirectly through downward pressure on wages.
The idea that as developing nations grow larger middle classes, they'll become more like us and environmental standards will be insisted upon by the people forced to live in that environment, has some merit. As people become more middle class they also have easier access to birth control and more of a desire to use it. That idea rests partly on political will and numerous other factors, including emancipation and education of women. It's really a horse and cart thing, a real causal relationship quagmire.
PeeBrain expresses the views of many who can't be blown off as purely racist, though he comes across that way sometimes. He feels besieged and has some negative views of the "invaders". This is human nature, and can be expected to occur whenever there is social upheaval and a deterioration of the economic environment. Govts. expect far too much of the average citizen if they think they're going to all join hands and sing "It's a small world, afterall" or "We are the world, we are the children" when they're overwhelmed and unhappy.
The blame should be placed squarely on the state and federal govt's blinkered ideological immigraton policy that provides cheap labour in the form of hamburger flipping jobs and nannies for the consumer. Seeing everything in terms of "consumers" is reductionist and extremely simple minded. It appears from what Peebrain is saying, these benefits are more than offset by the costs of increased taxes among other things.
I'd like to go to California and see first hand what's happening there.
Pee Brain
Mar 29 2004, 05:52 PM
not be nit-picky, but an ILLEGAL ALIEN is by definition here illegally and therefore a criminal.

geez, threadbare!
all of a sudden, circumstances throw you back into the petri dish with the great unwashed, its not fair

. i covered my mouth with my sweatshirt and tried to breathe the germ-filled ER air through my crude filter. i really worried about getting TB or some other third world malady; i tried not to touch anything. id rather scratch my own nuts than shake hands with an illegal alien. we've had numerous outbreaks of hepatitis here from people eating in restaurants; how did that happen

.
i went to el pollo loco last night and they were everywhere - the place looked like a tornado had hit it; 1/2-eaten food on tables, trash on floors, etc. ive noticed that hispanics routinely throw garbage on the ground when they are done with it - dont argue on this one, and dont bother with NOT ALL HISPANICS either. noticed it in MX too, people would take their trash and dump it on an adjacent vacant lot; eventually huge mounds of trash accumulate, along with rats and other creatures as well as diseases - just ignorance and laziness. anyway back to el pollo loco: the unkept little ones were wiping their runny noses with their hands and then climbing on the stainless steel counter, so the whole thing was infected. maybe they thought it was a porrly designed jungle-gym. then one spit onto the counter (into his reflection i guess) and swirled it around with his greasy sleeve. just this long slow louggie (snot/spit) dripped onto the counter. makes you wonder about dipping the spoon into the communal salsa bar

. anyway, i rarely eat uncooked food at restaurants, thats here in the USA as well as MX; or maybe i should refer to them jointly as AZTLAN

like our mecha amigos do

.
you can have the philosophical high ground, we're living at Ground Zero here and it aint very pretty. why do you think prices are exploding in desirable areas? WHITE (and asian) FLIGHT! pretty soon, you'll be able to order everything out and have it delivered to your gated community. hopefully, there will be some sort of sanitation checks on the delivery person. its a shame we work hard and pay taxes; then we're forced to support criminals, see our liberties eroding and have our lifestyles constrained. im all for writing them a check occassionally via foreign aid, but writing them a welfare check and co-existing with them in the same area is a bit much dont you think?
a move to reinstate prop 187 is afoot here in Aztlan, hopefully we can get it through before the hispanic voting participation increases above 17%.
threadbare
Mar 29 2004, 06:54 PM
Living like a pig is often a symptom of depression. I wonder if certain cultures aren't just clinically depressed or physically run down and can't keep up. What you see as lazy is the result of people working several jobs and having nothing in reserve left. I don't know, am not there to witness this.
I remember years ago a friend of mine showed me her brother's apartment. She told me I wouldn't believe it unless I saw it, and she was right. What struck me was what possible use a filthy blender would have in a bathtub. He ate a lot of in bed, then threw the boxes on the floor, creating an obstacle course of cardboard festooned with Italian names around his favorite "recliner". It would have been utterly futile for this guy to order a pizza that pledged delivery in less than ten minutes as it would take him a good ten minutes to wade through debris to answer the door. It turned out, to noone's surprise the brother was suicidal. Hopefully he's okay today.
In Canada, after a huge influx of Pakistanis came over, the comment you heard about them most frequently was that "they smelled". Well yeah, they had an odour of curry as that's what they ate. Apparently the ones with the worst odour are Caucasians because they eat so much meat. Some Asians find this repulsive, so this is all relative.
Pee Brain
Mar 29 2004, 11:32 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 29 2004, 01:54 PM) |
| Living like a pig is often a symptom of depression. |
living like a pig is a sympton of being a pig!
geez threadbare, re-read your apologist post - no one is responsible for themselves, right? guatamalans that throw garbage on the ground are not rude or ignorant, they may be culturally depressed.

isnt it just possible that there are some humans that are dirty and ignorant - that someone who was using his hand to wipe his ass last week shouldnt be making your salad at your local country club tonight. BTW, i smelled when i first went to japan - i could smell it myself after awhile, but after i changed-up my diet, i didnt smell anymore - and i was invited there, so they asked for my stench. but, i didnt spit on restaurant counters, i didnt whipe my snotty nose with the back or my hand, and i was (am) clean (and not on a relative basis either). so dont say they are lazy because they are tired or depressed - letting them into the country en masse is a big mistake. l

k at the results!
ill say it again: we have the most desirable country to live in and yet we make doctors and engineers wait thru a long INS process and quotas, while every brocero that can crawl under the fence sneaks into the USA, knocks up a brocera and gains legal resident status, while we pay for all of them. its nuts. ill take a pakastani doctor that smells like curry over any number of illegal aliens. id never go to a paki doctor anyway, so its hypothetical.
but seriously, these illegal aliens are killing us. 1/4 of CA's prison population is illegal aliens - thats a lot worse than paki curry-BO; and the infrastructure is breaking down literally - i stepped in a friggin pothole that was huge! i tried the city to put up no parking signs as we are on a narrow hillside street, but they painted lines in the street instead - why you ask? becuase if they put parking signs on my street they would have to do it all over town where they were required... well, DUH!!!! put 'em up!!!! oh sorry, there are no money of street improvements. maybe we could paint a chronic welfare recepiet white and red with a sandwhich board that says "No Parking/Estacimiento Prohibido".

oh no, thats demeaning, lets mail them their check instead.
if we can get Prop 187 again, that will be a start, 'cause if they had to pay for the infrastructure on a prorata basis, they would turn around, go home and wipe their asses with their hands in honduras or whereever. i kid with you alot, but think about 1/4 of the prison pop being illegals??????? that is a ton of dough, not to mention the misery to victims.
the east is red
Mar 30 2004, 02:47 AM
| QUOTE (Pee Brain @ Mar 29 2004, 06:32 PM) |
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 29 2004, 01:54 PM) | | Living like a pig is often a symptom of depression. |
living like a pig is a sympton of being a pig! geez threadbare, re-read your apologist post - no one is responsible for themselves, right? guatamalans that throw garbage on the ground are not rude or ignorant, they may be culturally depressed.  isnt it just possible that there are some humans that are dirty and ignorant - that someone who was using his hand to wipe his ass last week shouldnt be making your salad at your local country club tonight. BTW, i smelled when i first went to japan - i could smell it myself after awhile, but after i changed-up my diet, i didnt smell anymore - and i was invited there, so they asked for my stench. but, i didnt spit on restaurant counters, i didnt whipe my snotty nose with the back or my hand, and i was (am) clean (and not on a relative basis either). so dont say they are lazy because they are tired or depressed - letting them into the country en masse is a big mistake. l  k at the results! ill say it again: we have the most desirable country to live in and yet we make doctors and engineers wait thru a long INS process and quotas, while every brocero that can crawl under the fence sneaks into the USA, knocks up a brocera and gains legal resident status, while we pay for all of them. its nuts. ill take a pakastani doctor that smells like curry over any number of illegal aliens. id never go to a paki doctor anyway, so its hypothetical. but seriously, these illegal aliens are killing us. 1/4 of CA's prison population is illegal aliens - thats a lot worse than paki curry-BO; and the infrastructure is breaking down literally - i stepped in a friggin pothole that was huge! i tried the city to put up no parking signs as we are on a narrow hillside street, but they painted lines in the street instead - why you ask? becuase if they put parking signs on my street they would have to do it all over town where they were required... well, DUH!!!! put 'em up!!!! oh sorry, there are no money of street improvements. maybe we could paint a chronic welfare recepiet white and red with a sandwhich board that says "No Parking/Estacimiento Prohibido".  oh no, thats demeaning, lets mail them their check instead. if we can get Prop 187 again, that will be a start, 'cause if they had to pay for the infrastructure on a prorata basis, they would turn around, go home and wipe their asses with their hands in honduras or whereever. i kid with you alot, but think about 1/4 of the prison pop being illegals??????? that is a ton of dough, not to mention the misery to victims. |
Threadbare is reciting the mythology that somehow "all cultures are equal". In fact, the differences in the quality of life of different countries, their success and failures, can be attributed to the wisdom or stupidity of various cultural practices.
Q: What the definition of a conservative?
A: A liberal who'se been mugged.
If the breakdown that you describe were to occur in threadbare's affluent neighbourhood, you'd be hearing a very different tune
People can be very high-minded as long they do not personally suffer the consequences of their actions. Otherwise it soon becomes a case of NIMBY.
the east is red
Mar 30 2004, 03:11 AM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 28 2004, 07:31 PM) |
East is Red,
In North America, global warming is responsible for odd weather that has caused droughts that negatively impact food production, particularly wheat. I notice bread is more expensive than it was a couple of years ago.
Global warming is related to over use of oil. It's rocketing cost now is at least partly due to diminishing reserves.
You don't undermine my point, but rather reinforce it, by implying that the cost of commodities is not necessarily related to population but rather increased competition for those commodities, coming from places like China. Bingo! I agree that a certain amount of the cost increase in the U.S. is due to weakening dollar too.
Scientists and engineers have their place and have done a marvelous job at providing a convincing barrier of wellbeing between the average person and the natural world. Engineers and scientists will continue doing what they know how to do: construct technical fixes to problems caused by solutions they provided already. Where you see this approach as the logical answer, I see a Rube Goldberg machine based on a Rube Goldberg approach, descending straight from here to Hell. |
| QUOTE |
| In North America, global warming is responsible for odd weather that has caused droughts that negatively impact food production, particularly wheat. |
It's called "weather" which has been know to change over time. Recall the Dustbowl Drought of the '30s
Another assertion, just like overpopulation.
With overpopulation, neither you nor I nor anyone else has any idea what population the Earth can support.
As for global warming, it's another assertion often recited as fact.
The most accurate measurements of the earth's temperature is satelitte-based data.
This data shows that the earth's temperature has increased negligeably compared to the predictions of "global warming" models. Btw, these models don't take water vapour, ie., clouds into account.
The existence of global warming, contrary to popular mis-belief, is still a hotly debated topic in the scientific community.
Global Warming Debate| QUOTE |
| Engineers and scientists will continue doing what they know how to do: construct technical fixes to problems caused by solutions they provided already. Where you see this approach as the logical answer, I see a Rube Goldberg machine based on a Rube Goldberg approach, descending straight from here to Hell. |
Then I suggest that you move to some wilderness area where you won't have to suffer the "hell" created by scientists and engineers.
Or next time you are seriously ill, don't bother to seek modern medical care.
| QUOTE |
| It's much simpler to just curb our numbers. |
Then I suggest that you lead by example.
threadbare
Mar 30 2004, 04:00 AM
I agree with you on immigration policy, Pee Brain, but that's as far as it goes. Your assessment of Mexicans as stupid lazy etc...is the result of a cursory look at the tip of the iceburg.
Do they offer basic civics and cultural acclimatization programs at the local ymca or ywca? When in Rome, do as the Romans do. If the Romans don't leave snot streamers all over town, there's a message there for new citizens and visitors.
East is Red, I AM leading by example. I haven't had children, which is a much better idea than the retroactive abortion your theories would impose on the next generation. I also DO live in a wilderness area. I avoid shopping as much as possible and I don't drive a vehicle....and my life is completely satisfying.
As far as going to doctors when I'm sick. Aside from trauma induced injury, I'd prefer swallowing newts prescribed by medievil barbers than taking some of the rat poison that passes as modern pharmeceuticals out there in the mainstream.
Though I respect cultural relativity, I can certainly see that in the realm of intellectual debate, some arguments are just stronger and better relative to others. This back and forth is a good example of that. The concluding comment in your last post is typical of an insult tossed off by a beaten man. Chin up, better luck next time.
Pee Brain
Mar 30 2004, 04:03 AM
these discussions always hinge on entitlement in some form or another. people should enter the country legally, they are not entitled to stay here just because they managed to sneak in. yes i feel sorry for them, now they should leave. why the liberal whining just becuase they are here, hell, the worlds full of people living in filth and ignorance, but its better there than here (which is anywhere near me).
and lest you think these are happy, innocent campisinos smiling at you when you leave the room, here is an example of the tripe your hearts are bleeding for... BTW, Aztlan is like southwestern USA and i think MX, these asswipes are so crazy i cant keep up. and while you are reading this, ask yourself who benefits if 16 yo are allowed a 1/2 vote and 14 yo a 1/4 vote in state elections. and when you are done reading this little manfesto of love remember that I TOLD YOU SO! the wya to get around this is buy at the top of the mountain and aim high when shooting downhill.
EL PLAN DE AZTLÁN
El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán
In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud
historical heritage but also of the brutal "gringo" invasion of our
territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land
of Aztlán from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their
birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare
that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our
inevitable destiny.
We are free and sovereign to determine those tasks which are justly called
for by our house, our land, the sweat of our brows, and by our hearts.
Aztlán belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather
the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. We do not recognize capricious
frontiers on the bronze continent
Brotherhood unites us, and love for our brothers makes us a people whose
time has come and who struggles against the foreigner "gabacho" who exploits
our riches and destroys our culture. With our heart in our hands and our
hands in the soil, we declare the independence of our mestizo nation. We are
a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of North
America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation,
we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlán.
For La Raza to do. Fuera de La Raza nada.
Program
El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán sets the theme that the Chicanos (La Raza de
Bronze) must use their nationalism as the key or common denominator for mass
mobilization and organization. Once we are committed to the idea and
philosophy of El Plan de Aztlán, we can only conclude that social, economic,
cultural, and political independence is the only road to total liberation
from oppression, exploitation, and racism. Our struggle then must be for the
control of our barrios, campos, pueblos, lands, our economy, our culture,
and our political life. El Plan commits all levels of Chicano society - the
barrio, the campo, the ranchero, the writer, the teacher, the worker, the
professional - to La Causa.
Nationalism
Nationalism as the key to organization transcends all religious, political,
class, and economic factions or boundaries. Nationalism is the common
denominator that all members of La Raza can agree upon.
Organizational Goals
1. UNITY in the thinking of our people concerning the barrios, the pueblo,
the campo, the land, the poor, the middle class, the professional-all
committed to the liberation of La Raza.
2. ECONOMY: economic control of our lives and our communities can only come
about by driving the exploiter out of our communities, our pueblos, and our
lands and by controlling and developing our own talents, sweat, and
resources. Cultural background and values which ignore materialism and
embrace humanism will contribute to the act of cooperative buying and the
distribution of resources and production to sustain an economic base for
healthy growth and development Lands rightfully ours will be fought for and
defended. Land and realty ownership will be acquired by the community for
the people's welfare. Economic ties of responsibility must be secured by
nationalism and the Chicano defense units.
3. EDUCATION must be relative to our people, i.e., history, culture,
bilingual education, contributions, etc. Community control of our schools,
our teachers, our administrators, our counselors, and our programs.
4. INSTITUTIONS shall serve our people by providing the service necessary
for a full life and their welfare on the basis of restitution, not handouts
or beggar's crumbs. Restitution for past economic slavery, political
exploitation, ethnic and cultural psychological destruction and denial of
civil and human rights. Institutions in our community which do not serve the
people have no place in the community. The institutions belong to the
people.
5. SELF-DEFENSE of the community must rely on the combined strength of the
people. The front line defense will come from the barrios, the campos, the
pueblos, and the ranchitos. Their involvement as protectors of their people
will be given respect and dignity. They in turn offer their responsibility
and their lives for their people. Those who place themselves in the front
ranks for their people do so out of love and carnalismo. Those institutions
which are fattened by our brothers to provide employment and political pork
barrels for the gringo will do so only as acts of liberation and for La
Causa. For the very young there will no longer be acts of juvenile
delinquency, but revolutionary acts.
6. CULTURAL values of our people strengthen our identity and the moral
backbone of the movement. Our culture unites and educates the family of La
Raza towards liberation with one heart and one mind. We must insure that our
writers, poets, musicians, and artists produce literature and art that is
appealing to our people and relates to our revolutionary culture. Our
cultural values of life, family, and home will serve as a powerful weapon to
defeat the gringo dollar value system and encourage the process of love and
brotherhood.
7. POLITICAL LIBERATION can only come through indepen-dent action on our
part, since the two-party system is the same animal with two heads that feed
from the same trough. Where we are a majority, we will control; where we are
a minority, we will represent a pressure group; nationally, we will
represent one party: La Familia de La Raza!
Action
1. Awareness and distribution of El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán. Presented at
every meeting, demonstration, confrontation, courthouse, institution,
administration, church, school, tree, building, car, and every place of
human existence.
2. September 16, on the birthdate of Mexican Independence, a national
walk-out by all Chicanos of all colleges and schools to be sustained until
the complete revision of the educational system: its policy makers,
administration, its curriculum, and its personnel to meet the needs of our
community.
3. Self-Defense against the occupying forces of the oppressors at every
school, every available man, woman, and child.
4. Community nationalization and organization of all Chicanos: El Plan
Espiritual de Aztlán.
5. Economic program to drive the exploiter out of our community and a
welding together of our people's combined resources to control their own
production through cooperative effort.
6. Creation of an independent local, regional, and national political party.
A nation autonomous and free - culturally, socially, economically, and
politically- will make its own decisions on the usage of our lands, the
taxation of our goods, the utilization of our bodies for war, the
determination of justice (reward and punishment), and the profit of our
sweat.
El Plan de Aztlán is the plan of liberation!
Pee Brain
Mar 30 2004, 04:10 AM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 29 2004, 11:00 PM) |
Do they offer basic civics and cultural acclimatization programs at the local ymca or ywca? When in Rome, do as the Romans do. If the Romans don't leave snot streamers all over town, there's a message there for new citizens and visitors.
|
threadbare you're losing touch. it is not our responsibility to provide programs for illegal aliens to acclimate. we should be providing only rides home or jail sentences - better yet, they can walk home, from Nebraska if that's where they catch 'em. they are criminals, not even 'Merikan criminals at that. BTW, there are programs like WIC that provide everything down to nutrition classes... funny, ive never been invited? oh yeah, they're in spanish, how stupid of me?
gee, again its my fault that some asswipes nino spit on a counter - what im not a good enough example. i thought my NOT SNEAKING into their pais and demanding services im not entitled to was example enough? ill just have to work harder. im telling you, one day people are gonna get fed up with this b.s. and start opting outta the matrix. then who will you blame?
the east is red
Mar 30 2004, 05:35 AM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 29 2004, 11:00 PM) |
| Though I respect cultural relativity, I can certainly see that in the realm of intellectual debate, some arguments are just stronger and better relative to others. This back and forth is a good example of that. The concluding comment in your last post is typical of an insult tossed off by a beaten man. Chin up, better luck next time. |
Hardly. It appears that you're the one whose "declared victory and retreated".
As your entire arguement regarding overpopulation has been one of repeated assertion and you've avoided replying to the myth of global warming I'd say that it's clear as whose carried this argument - and it's not you.
Btw, my congragulation on removing yourself from humanity's gene pool.
A very sensible decision. This strikes me as a case of "the personal is the political"
- overpopulation is a rationalization for your own lifestyle choices.
In some sense you have to believe in overpopulation - otherwise your personal sacrifices, such as they are, are meaningless.
the east is red
Mar 30 2004, 05:39 AM
| QUOTE (Pee Brain @ Mar 29 2004, 11:10 PM) |
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 29 2004, 11:00 PM) | Do they offer basic civics and cultural acclimatization programs at the local ymca or ywca? When in Rome, do as the Romans do. If the Romans don't leave snot streamers all over town, there's a message there for new citizens and visitors.
|
threadbare you're losing touch. it is not our responsibility to provide programs for illegal aliens to acclimate. we should be providing only rides home or jail sentences - better yet, they can walk home, from Nebraska if that's where they catch 'em. they are criminals, not even 'Merikan criminals at that. BTW, there are programs like WIC that provide everything down to nutrition classes... funny, ive never been invited? oh yeah, they're in spanish, how stupid of me? gee, again its my fault that some asswipes nino spit on a counter - what im not a good enough example. i thought my NOT SNEAKING into their pais and demanding services im not entitled to was example enough? ill just have to work harder. im telling you, one day people are gonna get fed up with this b.s. and start opting outta the matrix. then who will you blame? |
The Australians have a far better approach. Illegal immigrants are detained in a remote northwestern area of Australia until deportation. Escape is almost certain death by dehydration. The word gets out, there's no free lunch, and the number of illegal immigrants drops.
In Sarawak, the problem is illegal immigration by Indonesians from neighouring Kalimantan. Regretably their behaviour is much like what you've described. It tends toward the criminal.
However, Sarawakians do not feel obligated to cater to the ways of these illegals. For example, there were a recent series of purse-snatching,
leading to the newspaper headline "Women Warned to Beware of Snatch Thieves". In each case the thieves were quickly apprehended by the local citizenry and justice was both very swift and very severe. The taxpayers were saved the cost of detention, trial, and deportation.
threadbare
Mar 30 2004, 04:48 PM
Pee Brain, You don't get it. I'm on your side. I'm just not a bigot, so frame problems differently. I think referring to people as asswipes does actually put you in the bigot category. Sorry. The comment about cultural acclimatization programmes, I meant for legal immigrants. Look, I think illegals should be sent back and I think there should be an indefinite freeze on legal immigration. If I didn't make that clear, I apologize.
Unlike Australia where illegals have to enter by boat, the U.S. has a long unguarded border. Perhaps tax money would be better spent policing those borders. Then the govts and people can begin discussions on overpopulation and it's dire consequences.
East is Red, You claim I didn't respond to information about the "myth" of global warming. I tried to do that without providing a blizzard of stats and an endless list of links.
There is a huge body of evidence, supporting global warming, compiled by scientists who don't have a financial conflict of interest. That information is up against the body of information compiled by scientists funded by institutions who do. If you prefer to support the weakling in an intellectual prize fight where the reward is a dying planet, do so.
As far as your congratulating me for removing myself from the gene pool --Allow me to commend you for your mastery of the back handed compliment. You may now proceed to sixth grade.
the east is red
Mar 30 2004, 06:37 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 30 2004, 11:48 AM) |
There is a huge body of evidence, supporting global warming, compiled by scientists who don't have a financial conflict of interest. That information is up against the body of information compiled by scientists funded by institutions who do. If you prefer to support the weakling in an intellectual prize fight where the reward is a dying planet, do so.
|
Actually, these scientists do have a financial conflict of interest.
Question global warming and your funding dries up.
Global warming has been an abolute gold-mine for those in the field in terms of funding.
Besides the fact the data does not support the prediction of the global "warming" models in question;
that the models can't even predict a massive climatic event such as El Nino;
that they don't take cloud cover in account;
carbon sequestration by the oceans;
I'll also add the recent evidence shows that cyclical patterns in global temperature are closely tied to the cyclical sunspot activity.
As I've pointed may times before,
you prefer assertion and appeals "authority" figures,
I prefer to look at the evidence.
Our planet is not currently dying, the claims of modern-day flaggelants notwithstanding.
The earth will die only when the Sun does.
threadbare
Mar 30 2004, 08:24 PM
Question global warming and you can double your money working for institutions funded by big oil. Sorry East, this is transparently obvious.
You sound like you have some emotional attachment to this issue. Do you have a financial stake in your anti-malthusian doctrine as well?
Pee Brain
Mar 31 2004, 12:08 AM
thats right i am bigotted against asswipes

i wonder if you would care to comment about the aims of mecha and ztlan.
bontchev
Mar 31 2004, 12:33 PM
| QUOTE (the east is red @ Mar 30 2004, 01:37 PM) |
| The earth will die only when the Sun does. |
Only if it manages to recover from the plague that has currently infected it - a plague called "humanity". If it doesn't, it will die much sooner.

As for not believing the theory of global warming, what particular evidence do you have that disproves it? Just that climatology isn't advanced enough to predict the timing of short-term catastrophic events like El Nino does not mean that the general theory is wrong. The cloud cover can even increase the greenhouse effect - see Venus.
Regards,
Vesselin
the east is red
Mar 31 2004, 09:04 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Mar 30 2004, 03:24 PM) |
Question global warming and you can double your money working for institutions funded by big oil. Sorry East, this is transparently obvious.
You sound like you have some emotional attachment to this issue. Do you have a financial stake in your anti-malthusian doctrine as well? |
Implicit in your "big oil" statement is that "big oil" is bad.
The reality is that oil exploration, development, and processing has to be big in order to be economical and in order to mutualize the huge financial risks inherent in these undertakings. As all the dry wells around Miri, Malaysia will testify.
The other reality is that the US economy could not function without this oil. On the other hand, it could get by just fine without you
What is transparently ridiculous is your naive assumption that academics are noble seekers of the truth rather than grant-grubbers.
Btw, big oil couldn't afford to employ all the "global warming" researchers out there.
Emotional attachment? Financial stake? Neither actually. It's just that I find it annoying to hear these unsubstantiated myths parroted by people who don't know or understand what they're talking about. The modern day flaggelants.
threadbare
Mar 31 2004, 11:14 PM
I don't care if a scientist is working for a wildcatter or "big oil" his data is going to be extruded through the biases of those institutions.
I have actually linked several posts which attest to the prostitution of science, so I don't disagree with you there. I'll even concede that global warming CAN become an entrenched orthodoxy.The present climate change could be partly due to ongoing cycles, irrespective of human impact. It makes common sense, though, to try to get a fix on whether or not we've helped to trigger this latest cycle. We also have to be open to the data that suggests we're making it worse. We may be able to sustain a 5% rise in global temperature, occurring as a result of a natural cycle, but what if humanity, in aggregate, is raising it to 10%?
Scientists are a perfect example of the behaviorist model of psychology... stimulus response, and subsequent reward of grant money, true. But another layer of compromised credibility is added if the institutions they're working for are operating within several layers of commercial complicity.
Pee Brain
Apr 1 2004, 12:19 AM
today, a bill to rollback the $16,000 in-state tution subsidy for illegal aliens was defeated (10 TO 1 NO LESS!). 7,500 californians were turned away last year and yet illegal aliens pay "discounted" in-state university fees.
BTW, dependents of military personeel only get one year at in-state rate.... go fight for your country and move here you are screwed. sneak in from guatamala or some other central amercian craphole and you are treated like a resident. welcome to Aztlan?
dont say you didnt know, I TOLD YOU SO!
I GOTTA GET OUTTA HERE. SOMEONE STICK A FORK IN CALIFORNIA, ITS DONE!

ITS SO STUPID ITS ALMOST FUNNY~

, BUT ITS NOT.
the east is red
Apr 1 2004, 01:37 AM
| QUOTE (Pee Brain @ Mar 31 2004, 07:19 PM) |
today, a bill to rollback the $16,000 in-state tution subsidy for illegal aliens was defeated (10 TO 1 NO LESS!). 7,500 californians were turned away last year and yet illegal aliens pay "discounted" in-state university fees.
BTW, dependents of military personeel only get one year at in-state rate.... go fight for your country and move here you are screwed. sneak in from guatamala or some other central amercian craphole and you are treated like a resident. welcome to Aztlan?
dont say you didnt know, I TOLD YOU SO!
I GOTTA GET OUTTA HERE. SOMEONE STICK A FORK IN CALIFORNIA, ITS DONE! ITS SO STUPID ITS ALMOST FUNNY~ , BUT ITS NOT. |
There is probably nothing more dangerous to the well-being of a society than well-intentioned altriusts.
The situation in California is a case in point.
the east is red
Apr 1 2004, 01:41 AM
| QUOTE (bontchev @ Mar 31 2004, 07:33 AM) |
| QUOTE (the east is red @ Mar 30 2004, 01:37 PM) | | The earth will die only when the Sun does. |
Only if it manages to recover from the plague that has currently infected it - a plague called "humanity". If it doesn't, it will die much sooner.  As for not believing the theory of global warming, what particular evidence do you have that disproves it? Just that climatology isn't advanced enough to predict the timing of short-term catastrophic events like El Nino does not mean that the general theory is wrong. The cloud cover can even increase the greenhouse effect - see Venus. Regards, Vesselin |
Actions speak louder than words. Lead by example in reducing the spread of this "plague".
You're right - global warming is a theory - the problem is the lack of real observational data to support this theory.
You got the scientific method reversed. The onus is on the propents of a new theory to provide experimental evidence to verify it's predictions, not the other way around.
ShitEatingGrinner
Apr 1 2004, 06:10 AM
| QUOTE |
| The onus is on the propents of a new theory to provide experimental evidence to verify it's predictions, not the other way around. |
true, but counterproductive and stupid. a quick read of Kuhn's "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" demonstrates why.
http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhn.htmlConsidering that the consequences of getting it wrong (should the warmists be ultimately correct), isn't it logical to err on the side of safety? Or perhaps New York, Houston, New Orleans, and a few other cities dunked in the ocean is an acceptable consequence? What kills me is the attribution by warming deniers of nefarious and malign motives on the part of scientists who believe it is occurring. But, you have to follow the money...who's funding the research?...when considering evidence.
My sympathies, PB, on the funding thing. Does seem absurd when the state is in a fiscal crisis.
threadbare
Apr 1 2004, 05:27 PM
Pee Brain, That sort of thing would drive me out of my mind if I lived there. You have my sympathies. Something is VERY wrong with that state. Fuzzy headed altruism hand in hand with commercial interests lobbying govt., is my intuitive take on it. So where you moving to? Any ideas?
Pee Brain
Apr 1 2004, 07:20 PM
| QUOTE (threadbare @ Apr 1 2004, 12:27 PM) |
Pee Brain, That sort of thing would drive me out of my mind if I lived there. You have my sympathies. Something is VERY wrong with that state. Fuzzy headed altruism hand in hand with commercial interests lobbying govt., is my intuitive take on it. So where you moving to? Any ideas? |
NV or WA, probably nevada... my fear is that still may be a portion of Aztlan

. actually, im afraid if i move to the area west of reno, NV the same thing will happen again.
i might move to Idaho & hit Yobob1 up for a job.... i already have a warm weather haven, so if its too cold to snow ski, i can hit the beach - great surf and 80 degree water in the winter

. ahhhhhhhhhhhh
im also playing with the idea of moving to another country and renting. ive lived a number of places and liked them all (maybe frankfurt leastl). the idea of tying up $300,000 to $400,000 in an abode and being anchored to an area is not as attractive vs. investing the money and paying rent (you know the drill, hey mr/mrs landlord, your water lines are leaking!). renting is becoming a much more viable alternative, because with income from my house fund (instead of buying a home) and pushing some jello around the plate, i think i can retire real soon.
much of this thread has been tongue in cheek, but i do believe getting as tax lean (vs. lien) as possible and having the ability to live well on less is gonna be a great strategy in the coming years. illegal immigration is apparently NOT going to let up; also witness high birth rates for illegals and insant resident status to parents of a USA nino - so the times they are a' changing. also, there appears to be no political will to stop spending and tell people if you make min wage, you cant afford 7 ninos, among other things.

i am a native CA and i love the ocean (particularly when the hepatitis signs arent posted due to TJ river untreated "waste"), but the mindset here mortifies me. i could pay my housing expense in reno on the state taxes i pay here - gee, pay into the blackhole or buy a house (or rent a doozy)... i tell you, im amazed the exodus hasnt started yet... maybe it will take a jump in unemployment or a bust of the r.e. bubble to force people to change. i dont care, ive decided.
threadbare
Apr 1 2004, 08:07 PM
Interesting, PeeBrain. I'm building a live aboard cabin on the back of my boat, with the idea of spending part of the summer and winter on board. If the sh** hits the fan in the Great White North I can sell or rent out my house and move right on board. I never in my wildest dreams thought I'd have to be making all kinds of contingency plans for the future, based on a world that appears to be coming apart at the seams. I have more confidence in Canadian than American economy, particularly the dollar, but as Yobob is at pains to point out, an eventual synchronized fiat failure is a possibility.
So, where you going to store cash? Does it make you nervous to put it in the bank?