Stanley G. Hilton has filed a class action lawsuit in Federal court in
Northern California against against high officials in the current Bush
administration (including the federal government, Bush, Cheney, Rice,
Mueller, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft), for complicity in aiding and
abetting and facilitating the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks:
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/StanleyHiltonLawsuit.shtmlHis suit contends, and we strongly concur, that the defendants did so
in order to launch unconstitutional aggressive war against the
sovereign states of Afghanistan and Iraq, declare political opponents
"enemy combatants," suspend the Constitution indefinitely, etc., all
for sordid political ends which subvert the very system of laws and
Constitution the defendants have sworn to uphold in their offices.
The suit alleges that Bush, as President, violated the US Constitution
by deliberately lying to - and defrauding - the US Congress into
passing an "Enabling Act" resolution in October 2002, authorizing Bush
to wage aggressive war on Iraq. The war is unconstitutional and an
illegal drain on the US taxpayers' funds in the treasury. The suit
alleges the Iraq war is unconstitutional and that declaratory and
injunctive relief should be ordered. It is unconstitutional and
illegal because the president violated the Separation of Powers
provisions of the Constitution by deliberately lying to the Congress
by falsely assuring them that Bush had evidence of weapons of mass
destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and that Iraq was involved in plotting and
carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade center
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/TwinTowers.shtmland the Pentagon
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttack.shtmlattacks actually orchestrated by defendants. The suit also alleges
that the USA PatriotActs I and II are unconstitutional and must be
struck down as such, because they violate the fourth, fifth, ninth and
first amendments to the US Constitution, by permitting the government
to spy on Americans and violate their rights to privacy, and because
the Patriot Acts, like the war in Iraq, were passed under false and
fraudulent circumstances presented by defendants to the Congress.
The suit argues that to the extent that the US Constitution is legally
analogous to a "contract" between the government and the plaintiffs
(taxpayers), it seems that deliberate fraud by defendants should
nullify any unconstitutional acts by them, such as the aggressive war
and occupation of Iraq and the Patriot Acts.
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/PatriotAct.shtmlThe Plaintiffs believe they have the right to bring this suit as
American citizens and that they face an imminent threat to their
freedom from defendants, arising out of the entire orchestrated
scenario of 9/11, the PA laws that were passed as a proximate result
of 9/11, and the actions of defendants in infringing on their
constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.
911review.org strongly supports Stanley Hilton's courageous actions to
hold the officials responsible for the 9/11 massacres liable to
punishment, and to repeal all of the Fraudulent 9/11 Legislation
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/FraudulentLegislation.shtmlHilton is presisting in this legal action despite threats to his life
and we call on all our readers to support his actions by all means
neccessary.