Well I'll just say up front I'm happy but I'm trying to be cool and unemotional no matter what happens. I think this is a mark of trading maturity for after all this is a job, this investing lark, but one that I hope we all can and do enjoy.
I'd just like to visit the comments I made the day before yesterday, which suddenly seems like such a long time ago. After a very long diatribe on models which I will revisit briefly I wrote the timing as follows:
From Aug 31 2005, After the close.
QUOTE
ST Hooey Timing, looking at the move from the July low to August high we are out of fibs. May find some support at 195-196 but 100+% looks likely. Thus 190-191 here we come. All systems accelerating down, nothing encouraging at all.
Long Term, same story except different. Everything negative and accelerating down but we are sitting on the first fibbing retracement level from the May-Aug rally. If breached 2 pronged support around 196 level then 50% retracement at 192.5 and July low for support.
In 2004 once the August rally started the 20 and 10 eEMA lines never came close to each other until they crossed on Dec 1 a few days after the peak. This year we have already crossed. I take this to mean that if we play out somewhat like last year the rally hasn't really begun yet and will likely start in earnest from somewhere between the May and July lows. If it ever does that is ....
Well one would have to say I was reading the goat entrails as pretty negative yet yesterday (less than a day later and what a difference a day makes

) I was confidently buying with both hands. Why, one might ask. Why, indeed! It's all about the model. As I stated in my diatribe, my model is conditional and non-predictive. So although I was giving all the reasons why I wanted to be in cash and laid out my expectations for lower numbers ahead, it was only the positional interpretation and not the prognostication that mattered. I DO NOT ACT ON MY PREDICTIONS. They are just for fun and to give myself a mental construct with which to look ahead to what MIGHT happen. But let's face it odds are they WON'T happen.
Anyway, so this is why that when the CONDITIONS had changed so dramatically in only a few hours of trading, I could also go with the flow (and luckily I was awake to do so.) And having the model takes much of the guesswork and emotional baggage out and replaces it with confidence and levelheadedness. I don't feel like I made a really good move yesterday. It's more like, on one hand I now have increased confidence in the model, although I was already pretty happy with it and on the other hand, that when it came down to the crunch I executed unemotionally (well nearly so

).
My model, at present is averaging 8.7% per trade and has made 35 closed long trades in nearly 5 years which averages out to more than 1 trade every 2 months. The duration of the trades (in calendar days) was from 1 to 119 days. Interestingly it was the very first trade that was the longest (almost 4 months.) In the last 2 years the average trade has fallen from 13.2% to 8.7% and not because it is losing money, but as a result of the tough trading range conditions, it has been making trades with lower percentage gains. But, of course, it doesn't predict whether this will continue or not. It just continues in and out and waits patiently for the returns to come. The only decision I need make, other than the fiddly ones at the turns which account for a percent or so here and there, are whether to stick with the suctor and the model that goes with it. I believe that even during hard times the model will make money, it's just a question of whether there would be easier pickings elsewhere. At the moment, tough as things are, I don't see any better place to be, than here struggling with the vagarities of the PMS suctor.
The model has gone through some tough times, the longest being Mar to Aug last year (and no doubt it would have been tough for most of the 20 years from 1980 to 2000.) and the worst being July to Dec '01. Yet the losses or flats have been more than compensated by the large gains made in the other times, the good times. And to give you a range, the worst trades were -3.5% and there were 3 of these in '01 and '02 and the best was in the first half of '02 when a 21.8% gain in 3 months was followed after a ten day break (buying in higher I might add) by a 58.5% gain. That's a 93% gain in 6 months. That will cover an awful lot of -4%s. I'd also like to add that these numbers include provisions for slippage and commission.
The model also is easily beating a buy and hold strategy. As of 23/8/05 (date of my last SELL) a B&H would have netted 166.8 HooeyPoints from the first signal at 40.1 on Nov 24,2000. This is an increase of 416%. Not bad. However, with the Hooey timer and its 35 trades, one would have netted 361.8 points which is just over 900%.
"So I guess I'm going to stay with him awhile."