data gathering. some have way low volume but Im still filtering options.
EPG- has two businesses: it runs a power plant that burns waste coal; it sells manure-methane converters. The latter is the growth business, as agribusiness sees it as a way to turn a pollution problem into an energy resource.
UGI-Developing propane and butane technolgies (mainly for europe and china), as well as some alternative (non petroleum) based fuels for electrical generation (also mainly for europe and china). Not very productive in terms of growth at the moment, however if they get their china piece moving in the right direction couls be very lucrative.
ESLR and SPWR. They make solar panels
got this
IMO, the most viable "alternative energy" is gas-to-liquids and coal-to-liquids, on EROEI basis (energy returned on energy invested).
SSL is a big player in the arena, but watch out for confiscatory taxation they may have to face from their gubmint.
RTK is a speculative CTL company to consider
The energy released from the fissioning of 1 pound of U-235 Uranium is the equivalent of 6000 BOE or 1400 metric tons fo coal.... Thought that was an interesting fact...
From another poster a couple years ago
This is actually one area I was interested in long beofre I was interested in stocks . I have been a supporter for years of a decentralized power system that actually encouraged consumers to invest in their own power sources and sell excess energy back to utilites . Transmission line loads would be lightened considerably and reliability would dramatically improve . ( Federal regulations on the transmission side of the equation need to be scaled back to encourage corporations to invest in projects not feasible for small consumers to do alone . ) For those of you who think this can already be done ... it can ... but in many juristictions across it is an intentional dog and pony show if you try to hook up an off the grid power source . Many places "bank" your power but take any excess at the end of the year without compenstaion . Others pay such a ridiculously small amount back it isn't worth the headache of trying to get hooked up in the first place . Still others force you to pay to install two seperate meters and have both read ... then pay you peanuts for any excess while charging you 5 times as much for any power you "used".
Federally mandated rules requiring an easy hookup process , standards for private equipment and reverse metering where one meter is run forward and backward with the consumer recieving 60 % of whatever the commercial power rate is for any excess generation would end power problems in the US overnight . Hundreds of thousands of homes and business already generate the power for all or some of their own power load . Making it actually profitable nationwide to do so would cause a flood of individual investment over the entire power grid coast to coast . ... Course the federal goverment would never do anything smart and easy .
Capstone Turbine (CPST)makes micro turbines that are just a bit larger than a tower case for your computer . They can burn natural gas or even sour biogas , make little noise , and have such a small footprint they can be installed in neighborhoods or even inside specific buildings . (The California power crunch caused many businesses to install their own power sources ... this last flicker will send them in droves to companies like Capstone ) There had already been several installed in New York city trying to alleviate the strain on the supply lines leading into the city .
Even better is BCON (Beacon Power ) They make flywheel storage systems out of carbon fibers . Both Capstone turbines and Beacon's flywheels use magnetic bearing technology that give them long operational lives .