DJ Fed's Bernanke:Money Supply Too Hazy To Be Core Policy Tool
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Gauges of inflation and economic growth based on
measures of the U.S. money supply haven't been reliable enough over the years
to play a core role in monetary policy, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
said Friday.
"Unfortunately, forecast errors for money growth are often significant, and
the empirical relationship between money growth and variables such as
inflation and nominal output growth has continued to be unstable at times,"
Bernanke said in remarks prepared for delivery to a European Central Bank
conference in Frankfurt.
In his prepared speech, the Fed chairman did not discuss the specifics of
current monetary policy or the economic outlook. He was scheduled to take
questions from the audience.
As an example of volatile money supply indicators, Bernanke noted that M2 -
a money supply measure including currency, demand deposits, time deposits,
savings deposits and non-institutional money market funds - shrank in the
fourth quarter of 2003 at the most rapid pace in about 44 years, even though
there was no apparent impact on prices or spending.
Some economic theory supports a close link between money supply and monetary
policy. And in practice during the late 1970s and early 1980s then-Fed
Chairman Paul Volcker successfully fought double-digit inflation by targeting
non-borrowed reserves as a means of controlling M1 and M2 money supply
measures, Bernanke said. M1, the narrowest money supply category, includes
currency and demand deposits.
" But since 1982 when the Fed dropped its focus on non-borrowed reserves,
money and credit supply have not played a central role in monetary policy"It is, the
Fed chairman said.
"In the United States, deregulation, financial innovation and other factors
have led to recurrent instability in the relationships between various
monetary aggregates and other nominal variables," he said.
Money supply estimates have gotten harder over the years as U.S. banks
offered new types of accounts, and new payment technologies such as Internet
banking emerged, Bernanke said. Moreover, between one-half and two-thirds of
U.S. currency is now held abroad, making currency flow estimates imprecise, he
said.
"Although a heavy reliance on monetary aggregates as a guide to policy would
seem to be unwise in the U.S. context, money growth may still contain
important information about future economic developments," he said, noting Fed
staff still work hard to model and project money supply.
Bernanke said money growth considerations are "sensible as part of the
eclectic modeling and forecasting framework used by the central bank."
Fed chairman said.
I've read this 30 times and each time it makes less sense or should I say each time it becomes more nonensical. Try it yourself. It's one thing to bury moneterism one more time but if credit supply doesn't figure in monetary policy, and money does't either then what does? Can a policy be called monetary policy if it doesn't actually target credit, or God forbid, MONEY.