QUOTE(DrStool @ Dec 27 2007, 06:21 PM)
I assume that you know that you would get the same reaction from a man uninterested in these types of matters as well.
Of what relevance is a person's sex when it comes to the economy? If they're not interested, they're not interested. Male, female, or other. It's irrelevant.
But Herrr Dok,while agreeing with you 87% I must call your attention to the opening generaliization where I refer to "WE" Amerikuns,,,,which collective pronouns, if examined carefully, both include all thirteen sexual dispositions within the current erotic geography of America....and I also reffered to Infantilism, and Adolescence two genera presumably including both sexes which presiumably involves including myself both times as well.
Of course there are abundant crowds of male Ignoramuses ignorant collectively of countless subjects,let alone economics:I, being a male, who would know better?
I presumed the genera implicitly included all sexes...
But for economy's sake I ,upon occasion, exerciseing the ancient admonition:Brevity is the soul of Wit " and,in the process, risk missing the mark terribly; for which I plead guilty and do apologise...
beardrech

Rarely is it the case when I CRITICISE ANYTHING without,at some level including myself.....Or else why the mantra "It takes one to know one....