QUOTE(DrStool @ Feb 20 2008, 07:52 PM)
I guess you weren't around in the 70s. Massive bull markets in energy and natural resources. Everything else was complete K-rap.
Everyone has this idea that stock prices are "telling us something" about something else, like the economy, or the price of another kind of stock. Stock prices don't "say" anything about anything. Except themselves of course. They make patterns, and from those patterns we can deduce what they are likely to do beyond this point.
But it's really dangerous to make these assumptions beyond that. Just because one group moves, that does not imply anything about what another group will do. The correlations are really haphazard. It's amazing that conventional wisdom in this regard is so ingrained. People actually think that the stock market "knows something."
It's ridiculous. It's religious faith with no basis in fact. People believe it because they choose to. But it's absolute nonsense. The only thing stock prices tell us is how much extra liquidity is in the system, or how scarce liquidity is. That ties in with psychology. They feed on each other. Psychology weakens when liquidity dries up, which tends to make psychology even weaker. But there will be no real turn in the broad market unless liquidity is expanding. Certain groups that are in favor can move, but a lack of liquidity will limit the moves to those groups. Groups which are moving tend to get all the love.
None of which is to say that I am or am not bullish at the moment. For that, people will have to read the Wall Street Examiner Professional Edition. If you count the number of longs and the number of shorts among the chart picks, that should tell you all you need to know.
And the total number of picks will tell you how strong my convictions are. A scale of 1 to 10 would fit nicely.
Doc
My wife was (is?) a trained zoologist. A few of her courses were taught by a Professor Ginsburg who trained wolves into becoming pusillanimous wusses and alternately, rabbits into becoming viscious little carrot eating bastards..
To see how malleable and docile wild beasts were...
One of the attributes he encouraged his students to develope, while they were working in his lab, was to cultivate a rather unscientific anthropomorphism ,which translated, meant for the students to use human verbiage in describing their behaviour..he felt that using a purely scientific jargon would efface the more subtle niceties of animal conduct..
Now granted watching gauges in a powerhouse without attributing human motivation to them is warranted....
Similarly I agree with you that trying to put the accents of Lawrence Olivier on Stock charts and cycles is rather feckless....but, at the same time,metaphorically speaking, trying to surgically sever "gut responses" is, as you well know, practically impossible...No matter how hard we try, there will always be a residue of subjectivism in all of our judgements and decisions..
As evidence for the above,Time and again, we all, from time to time, invoke the trinity of "should,coulda,woulda" certifying the presence this deathless infirmity...
So the questioin then becomes: In what way can I put a face on this disposition so that I dont fall victim to its disturbing insurgencies???? Something like taming a wolf....
And by the way, we are very lucky that we have limits on our ability towards emotional self-mutilation....lest we enjoy the life of an occupational zombie
beardrech

I keyed on exxon, and was about to make my move short, and I almost pulled the trigger, when this sumabittch removed the stake from my heart....G'damn him and may he go to heaven where he belongs...